Trust before autonomy
Grounding, audit, human-in-the-loop and graduated control come before any write to a line.
Doughex exists to move the craft of industrial baking into reliable, auditable AI, so every loaf, roll and biscuit is safer, higher-yield and less wasteful. The bakery runs itself; the people who know dough decide how far.
Illustrative scenario: Plant run · one bread line, flour-lot change at the silo · shared oven. Not a measured run.
Baked goods are among the highest-volume foods on earth, produced on continuous, high-speed lines feeding billions daily. Running an industrial bakery is still one of the most craft-bound, energy-intensive and waste-heavy processes in food manufacturing, because dough is a living, variable, temperature- and time-sensitive biological system.
Flour, water, yeast and ingredients are dosed and mixed to exact dough development, fermented and proofed to exact rise, made up and deposited to exact weight and shape, baked to exact colour and moisture, cooled, sliced and packed, and inspected for colour, shape, holes, foreign bodies and seal faults. A drift at any step is waste, downgrade, giveaway or a recall.
Most plants run this on fixed recipes and oven profiles, spot checks and the judgment of a shrinking pool of bakers. The tools they have measure and log. None of them act. That is the gap.
Grounding, audit, human-in-the-loop and graduated control come before any write to a line.
A process engineer's correction is a labelled training event, not a complaint.
One line and one number first. The plant and the group follow the number.
Kill steps, metal detection, allergen changeover and release decisions stay with the plant's HACCP plan and its people.
Recipes and customer specs never cross a customer boundary. On-prem is an option, not an exception.
Golden datasets and model-as-judge evaluations gate model and prompt changes in CI.
Every Doughex run is an ordered, inspectable sequence. This is run_scn_01, an illustrative scenario: Plant run · one bread line, flour-lot change at the silo · shared oven. Scenario complete · every stage inside spec · one human approval at the oven.
Plant Orchestrator · Pulled the product spec, the recipe, the HACCP plan with its bake kill-step and metal-detection control points, the allergen status of the line and the new flour lot's certificate from MES and the lab system; locked the target envelope for the run.
Plant Orchestrator · Simulated 24 candidate profiles across mix, proof, deposit and oven on the Bakesim as-baked twin for the new flour lot; ranked them on colour and moisture margin, weight margin, energy per unit and takt, and discarded every candidate that thinned the bake kill-step margin.
Dose-and-Mix · Adjusted hydration and mix energy for the new lot's absorption so dough temperature and development landed on target; dough state was handed to the proofer with its predicted rise curve.
Ferment-and-Proof · Predicted the rise curve from inline height, temperature, humidity and CO2, then trimmed proofer humidity and dwell so rise and volume landed on target instead of running fast on the fresher lot.
Makeup-and-Deposit · Fused checkweigher readings with dough state and divider feedback and trimmed the divider in real time so portion weight sat at the minimum safe margin above the declared weight, with the underweight guardrail armed.
Plant Orchestrator · The twin's lowest-energy candidate wanted a zone-three temperature outside the site's bounded envelope. Held for the shift process engineer, who approved the step with a tighter colour alarm.
Bake-and-Cool · Ran the oven against the twin's colour and moisture prediction; stepped zone temperatures and band speed toward the minimum-energy profile while predicted crust colour and crumb moisture stayed inside spec and the core-temperature kill step was verified on every reading.
Defect-and-Inspect · 12 camera streams at oven exit, cooler exit and packing at the plant edge: colour, shape, holes, cracks, foreign-body and seal checks on every unit; two pale-top rejects were attributed to a draught at zone one and the oven agent was notified.
Robot-and-Handling · Robotic depanning, tray transfers and packaging handling paced to the line, with rejected units diverted off the belt and the safe zone around each cell monitored.
Quality-and-Conformance · Lot released: flour lot, recipe, mix and proof setpoints, portion weights, oven profile, kill-step readings, inspection rejects and every human decision written to the genealogy and checked against spec and the HACCP plan.
Dough is alive and the lines never stop, so perception has to be local and fast. Doughex runs GPU inference at the plant edge and keeps training, simulation and optimisation in the cloud, in a private cloud or on-prem. Items marked planned are on the roadmap, not running.
8 to 24 cameras per line plus inline moisture, weight, thermal and metal or X-ray streams. Design target: sub-100 ms reject decisions, 10 to 60 FPS per station, offline-tolerant operation at the plant edge.
Bake-prediction, defect, weight, shelf-life and bakery-reasoning models behind one orchestrator, with version routing by product, line and station. Plants run many lines, SKUs and models at once.
Vision, time-series, multimodal and bakery-process models fine-tuned from batch telemetry, images, engineer corrections and lab outcomes. Initial design target: 50 to 200 GPU-hours per product family per release.
GPU-accelerated oven CFD, proof heat and humidity dynamics, dough rheology and deformation, and robot cells, run as-baked before the run to find quality-safe, low-energy profiles.
Rare foreign-body, under- and over-bake, blistering, cracked-top, hole, deformation and seal or fill scenarios, generated with domain randomisation and validated against real plant events before use.
Oven and changeover scheduling, energy allocation across zones and lines, proof dwell allocation and line balancing, recomputed on the GPU when the line is disrupted.
Pan loading and unloading, tray transfers, reject diversion and packaging handling, with perception and motion policies built in Isaac Sim before they touch the line.
Bakery manufacturing automation, mixing, proofing and oven control, depositing and forming systems, inline quality and foreign-body inspection, food-safety systems, bakery MES and factory software. Autonomous proofing and baking control, defect and foreign-body sensing and bakery digital twins are the fastest-growing segments.
Doughex is led by its founder and CEO, Matthew Sinclair, and its CTO, Eric Donovan. The profiles below describe what each of them owns and the ground they cover.
Founder & CEO
Matthew runs the company and owns the design-partner relationships, the pilot structure and the commercial model. He decides which bakery and which line go first, what waste, giveaway or energy number a pilot is judged on, and who in the plant signs off on the baseline.
Focus: industrial bakery operations, food-manufacturing economics, plant partnerships and go-to-market.
CTO
Eric owns the plant-edge runtime, the dough, bake and inspection models, the as-baked product twin, and the audit architecture behind every Doughex agent. He is accountable for the bounded, logged write-back into mixers, proofers, depositors and ovens, and for every agent starting in shadow mode.
Focus: edge computer vision, process control, simulation and digital twins, safety-critical industrial software.
The roles we are building around are on the careers page. We look for people with hands-on bakery or food-manufacturing operations, applied AI at the edge, and experience shipping regulated, safety-critical software or hardware.
Doughex is built on dough, the raw heart of baking, with an ending chosen to stand apart from the rest of the portfolio it belongs to. The mark is a scored loaf on the oven band: a domed loaf with three diagonal score cuts, the slashes a baker makes before the oven, over the dark bar of the belt the loaf travels on in an industrial line. Scoring is a small, exact, process-defining action, which fits a company that controls dough development, proofing and bake.
Golden crust for the product rather than the machinery, and the oven band beneath it.
Talk to a plant director and the same costs surface. Depositors overshoot the target weight to avoid ever going underweight, so giveaway bleeds out gram by gram…
A head baker can look at dough and know it is proofing too fast. A process engineer can hear an oven and know the bake is drifting. That craft lives in a few pe…
Bakeries commit to a run and only discover colour misses, weight drift, collapsed proof or takt bottlenecks after the dough and the energy are spent. An as-desi…
The three people in an industrial bakery whose week changes when the line runs itself, and what each of them needs from Doughex.
Owns production rate, quality, waste, giveaway and yield, energy and food safety. Wants a bakery that holds spec at higher rate with fewer interventions, and a number that justifies the spend.
Owns recipes, dough development, proof and oven profiles, process windows and yield. Approves and corrects the agents in recommend mode; those corrections train the models.
Owns HACCP, FSMA, BRCGS, ISO 22000 and allergen conformance, foreign-body and defect conformance, and lot genealogy. Needs every action grounded, cited and written to an immutable record.
IT/OT and sustainability leads approve the deployment. There are no customer quotes on this site yet; design partners will speak for themselves when they choose to.
Doughex writes to production equipment in a food plant. Every capability is scoped, every write is policy-checked, every output is cited, and every action is written to an append-only audit log the plant owns.
| Item | Scope | Status |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type I | Cloud control plane | QUEUED Roadmap, first 6 months |
| SOC 2 Type II | Cloud control plane | QUEUED Roadmap, 6 to 12 months |
| HACCP · FSMA · BRCGS · ISO 22000 · allergen | Grounding and record-keeping | RUNNING Design basis for retrieval and the audit log |
| Per-tenant isolation | Data, memory, models | RUNNING Design rule |
| On-prem deployment | Recipe-sensitive bakeries | RUNNING Design option |
Doughex supports your food-safety records. It is not a certification and it does not replace your HACCP plan.
The questions plant directors, process engineers and quality managers ask in the first meeting.
Only at the autonomy level your plant has set, and only to an explicit allow-list of low-risk loops inside explicit limits. Every design partner starts in observe mode, where Doughex predicts and writes nothing. Recommend mode follows, where a process engineer approves each move. Bounded autonomy on oven, depositing and inspection loops comes after the food-safety and ROI gates agreed up front.
Critical control points are not optimisation variables. The bake kill step, metal detection and X-ray reject interlocks, allergen changeover and release decisions stay with your HACCP plan and your people. Doughex verifies readings, writes them to an immutable audit log and attaches them to the lot genealogy. It supports HACCP, FSMA, BRCGS, ISO 22000 and allergen records; it is not a certification and does not replace your plan.
Doughex sits above your existing automation as a supervisory layer. If it stops, the line keeps running on its current PLC and SCADA control and the interlocks it already has. A Doughex outage degrades the bakery to the way it runs today, not to a stop.
The first phase is observe mode on one line: Doughex reads your sensors, PLC history, QA checks and MES while you run the line as usual, and we measure its predictions against your own checkweigher, colour and moisture checks. Recommendations start when accuracy is proven against that baseline, and improve as plant-specific history and engineer corrections accumulate.
Recipes, product specs, tolerance models and customer specs are tenant-scoped and never used to train another customer's models. Retrieval is multi-tenant isolated and permission-aware. On-prem deployment is available for bakeries protecting sensitive recipes or private-label specs.
You are, the same as with any control strategy. That is why every write is policy-checked, bounded, logged and reversible, every output carries a citation to the recipe or procedure it relied on, and anything above your threshold waits for a named approver. The audit log records the request, the reasoning, the limits applied and the human decision.
As a design partner, on one line, with one hard metric: giveaway in grams per unit, energy per unit through the oven, downgrade and waste from under- or over-bake, or foreign-body and defect escapes. We instrument the line in observe mode, measure the baseline, move to recommend mode when accuracy is proven, and expand only when the number holds.
Full multi-module autonomy across the whole bakery, long-tail integrations beyond the design partners' stacks, and self-serve onboarding. The first release is one wedge workflow, its connectors, the agent loop with human checkpoints, the review console and the food-safety audit log.
Design partners, future colleagues and the people who sell to bakeries: the first conversation is about one line.
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc close